“When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be.” – Lao Tzu
“Allowing the personal to become public is the act of responsibility that initiates culture change and reforms organizations. Our need for privacy and our fear of the personal are primary reasons why organizational change is more rhetoric than reality. Real change comes from our willingness to own our vulnerability, confess our failures, and acknowledge that many of our stories do not have a happy ending.” (Peter Block)
Image Source: http://cloud9design.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/il_430xn-58492141.jpg
This past weekend, I had the opportunity to co-facilitate a session with Diana Benner (Central Texas Writing Project Teaching Consultant) entitled, Digitize This! Digitizing the Writing Workshop. The workshop is the culmination of several weeks of planning sessions. I have to admit that the journey from the point I agreed to present to the session yesterday was fraught with questions.
The questions centered around issues like:
- Has how we teach writing changed all that much?
- Has the way I taught writing workshop kept up with the way writing should be taught today?
- Would anyone discover me as a fraud, an ed-tech administrator speaking about a subject that he hasn’t really taught in over 15 years?
Note that this is part 1 of a 3 part reflection. If you want to find out more about the Heart of Texas Writing Project event, read the next blog entry.
In response to the first question, Has how we teaching writing changed all that much? I found that many teachers still don’t teach writing workshop a la Nanci Atwell and Luci Calkins. When I left my writing workshop classroom (having facilitated writing workshops at that point for 3 years at 5-6th grade level) to become an instructional technology specialist, I knew that the work I was doing as a writing workshop facilitator/teacher was powerful for myself and my students. But the work I could do in the field of Instructional Technology was even more powerful, especially as a writer who sought to use technology.
…with their political power, teachers and doctors capture governments and protect their incomes when there is pressure for budget cuts.
One of my favorite aspects of the Heart of Texas Writing Project technology session that took place this past Saturday was a roomful of individuals committed to supporting writing across the curriculum, pushing back against attitudes focused on scripting the teaching of anything and everything. Even in the session Diana and I facilitated, the alignment of curriculum–to the exclusion of writing workshop–came up. So, is writing workshop alive and well in today’s schools?
QUESTION #3 – FRAUD
One of my favorite passages in Robert Quinn’s books (can’t remember whether it’s Deep Change or Building the Bridge as You Walk Upon It) is when Quinn is having a conversation with another researcher. At some point, the researcher shares his worry that he will be found to be a fraud, that all his work and effort that is celebrated will be seen as flawed in some way, and he’ll be discovered in a negative way.
It is a feeling I identified with as I prepared to share my insights and experience on writing workshop, how technology might be used to facilitate that. I am an administrator who can now say he has spent more time facilitating professional learning opportunities about using technology in education than teaching writing and using technology within the classroom. Would someone call me out in the session and challenge me?
The answer is NO. While a part of me wonders if one or two of the teachers wondered what a technology director was doing presenting at a writing conference, for the most part, they were lost in the simple realization that they were not facilitating writing workshops as they knew they could be done. And, that was with the technology pieces put aside. I hope that at the end of the day, the technology pieces shared made a difference for them, enabled them to rediscover the writing workshop as I did looking back.
More importantly, as I remember the video of The Matrix I included in the presentation, it’s not about bending the spoon, but about yourself and your perspective. In revisiting writing workshop–which was a core part of my identity as a young teacher of writing, 20 years ago–I honestly feel I had the opportunity to experience the wisdom of Lao Tzu’s quote at the start of this blog entry.
Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org
Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin’s blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure
Discover more from Another Think Coming
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I don't understand how someone would be afraid of being found a fraud if they're not attempting to commit fraud. Fraud is an intentional act to deceive. If someone is sincerely working to do the best they can, they might be found to be mistaken or going in the wrong direction, but not a fraud.If you are open about your teaching experience, and how long it has been since you've taught writing, I don't see how you could be accused of being a fraud. It is possible someone might decide your knowledge is out of date, but that's an entirely different thing. You can counter that with current research.
I don't understand how someone would be afraid of being found a fraud if they're not attempting to commit fraud. Fraud is an intentional act to deceive. If someone is sincerely working to do the best they can, they might be found to be mistaken or going in the wrong direction, but not a fraud.If you are open about your teaching experience, and how long it has been since you've taught writing, I don't see how you could be accused of being a fraud. It is possible someone might decide your knowledge is out of date, but that's an entirely different thing. You can counter that with current research.