Privacy and Responsible Technology

Responsible technology use starts with people, data, purpose, evidence, consent, and the risks schools are willing to accept.

Privacy and responsible technology are recurring concerns across Miguel’s writing. Schools adopt tools to solve real problems, but those tools can introduce new risks. A useful app can still collect too much data, expose students to unclear terms, or create work that no one has planned to support.

This hub collects posts about student privacy, cybersecurity, responsible AI adoption, school data, tool evaluation, and governance questions. It is especially relevant when a tool is marketed as easy, free, AI-powered, or classroom-ready.

Miguel’s perspective is practical: technology decisions should start with purpose and risk, not novelty. Schools need tools that support learning while respecting student data, educator workload, accessibility, and public trust.

Important terms include data minimization, consent, governance, cybersecurity, responsible AI, terms of service, privacy policy, and risk review.

Original Frameworks

  • PROTECT: A rubric and planning lens for AI safety and governance.

Related Projects

  • DrawSplat: Privacy-first classroom tools and experiments.

Start Here

Recent Writing

Questions People Ask

What should schools ask before adopting a tool?

Ask what data is collected, who receives it, how long it is retained, whether students are involved, and how success will be evaluated.

Does a useful tool automatically belong in school?

No. Usefulness is only one factor. Privacy, accessibility, support, cost, and instructional purpose also matter.

Last reviewed:

View the complete filtered archive